URI BIO181G: The Information Age
Toggle navigation
Home
General Information
Weekly Materials
Day 26 12/11 Art
Day 25 12/6 Sports
Day 24 12/4 Transportation
Day 23 11/29 Genomics
Day 22 11/27 Genomics
Day 21 11/20 Environment
Day 20 11/15 Biodiversity
Day 19 11/7 Medical data
Day 18 11/6 Medical data
Day 17 11/1 Politics
Day 16 10/30 Words
Day 15 10/25 Social media
Day 14 10/23 Advertising
Day 13 10/18 Advertising
Day 12 10/16 Business
Day 11 10/11 Hiring and employment
Day 10 10/9 Employment and employees
Day 9 10/4 Google flu
Day 8 10/2 Criminal justice
Day 7 9/27 Crime data
Day 6 9/25 Gerrymandering
Day 5 9/20 Census
Day 4 9/18 Ethics
Day 3 9/13 Ethics
Day 2 9/11 Overview
Day 1 9/6 Intro
What data are available to understand crime rates and recidivism?
individual’s education
individual’s history of substance abuse
crimes commited by friends/family
individual’s neighborhood / socioeconomic status
individual’s history of crime
individual’s experience with police
highly dependent on neighborhood / race
family related experience
individual’s employment history
police / FBI reports of crime and victims
police judge people / neighborhoods based on “observed” crime
Crime analytics are good and morally acceptable
seems to reduce / might reduce violent crime
modeling recidivism factors might help us help people
models can be more fair by removing human bias
modeling recidivism may allow people who won’t commit crimes to get out
increased police presence in high crime areas can prevent crime
data is true so basing decisions on this can be helpful in reducing crime
so long as models are transparent and continually updated and compared to others
Crime analytics are not worth the moral cost and price of individual rights
models are potentially discriminatory
using socioeconomic status (and similar) reflects poorly on innocent people
overly targetted toward petty crimes without catching major crimes
increasing police presence in one area removes the police from other areas where they might be needed
doesn’t really solve the crime problem
data on where crime is happening may be biased
if data is totally transparent then what does this do to individuals